I've been reading through old issues of Model Trains magazine looking for articles on streetcar layouts. When I'm on these expeditions I often latch onto names of writers who for some reason catch my attention. In this case it was Boyce F. Martin. What I found on this trip was quite surprising.
It turns out there were two Boyce F. Martins, father and son. Both distinguished, and both interested in model trains, but it was Sr. who became the prolific author in the model railroad press.
Boyce Ficklin Martin, Sr. (1 Apr 1907 to 31 May 1981) was formerly Assistant Dean at the Harvard Business School, Dean of the Emory School of Business, and President of the Louisville Cement Company.
His byline was Boyce F. Martin, or sometimes just Boyce Martin. The Trains.com index tells me Sr. published 85 articles during his career: 39 in the NMRA Bulletin, 20 in Model Railroader, 15 in Model Trains / HO Monthly, 7 in Railroad Model Craftsman, and 4 in various books. There were also some letters to editors, and a mini-bio appeared in the May '52 MR. His first article was published in 1950, and the last in 1980; a good 30 year run. The University of Louisville Archives has a collection of his of model railroad article manuscripts, photographs, slides, railroad books, and correspondence. Their website states the collection spans the years 1948 to 1979, and takes up 10 linear feet.
Boyce Ficklin Martin, Jr. (23 Oct 1935 to 1 June 2016) was formerly a US circuit judge of the court of appeals for the sixth circuit, and from 1996 to 2003 was the chief judge of the circuit.
According to his May '52 MR mini-bio, Sr. got into the hobby in the late '40s when he bought Jr., who was 12 at the time, an O gauge tin plate train set and they both became enthralled by it. One thing lead to another and Sr. eventually built an HO layout called the Osage Railroad, which won first prize in MR's 1950 "How I Built My Railroad" contest, and is described in the Oct '50 issue of MR. That was Sr.'s first article, but his first publication in MR was a letter to the editor in the April '49 issue in response to a question in the Feb '49 issue that asked readers if the plural of caboose was cabooses or cabeese? Here's his response:
No moose are meese.
Two noose are nooses,
Cabeese? Cabooses?
Poor crummy, caboose.
If fleece are fleeces.
Are cabooses cabeese?
Call it caboose.
We all want peace.
Why not cabeese?
Who might even prefer some term like CABOOSESEESES!
Snipped from Houses for Sale; note Sr.'s PCC through the suburbs |
No comments:
Post a Comment