Friday, May 29, 2026

Doodlebug Country and The Case of the Missing RDC-M Prototype

Interurbans Special #77

Back in early April we visited the Prescott model railway show. It was wall-to-wall people, layouts, and vendors. It looked like a good time was being had by all. I bought a few things of course, and one was the book Doodlebug Country: The Rail Motorcar on the Class I Railroads of the United States by Edmund Keilty, published by Interurban Press in 1982. The book is #77 in the Interurbans Special series. It's a thorough compendium of photos and facts about self-propelled rail cars dating from 1900 to 1960.

Lately I've written very little about books I've bought and read as those posts seemed hardly accessed. I've been reconsidering my stance since finding out about how Anthropic shreds books it has bought after scanning them for consumption by their AI products. I'm a Luddite, and am probably the last one to hear of this, but it was still shocking to me. I read further and learned the practice is quite common at libraries and many other places that deal with books. So, I thought, well, when I'm dead my little library will wind up in a dumpster or shredder, so maybe I should write about what I find interesting in my collection so at least in the future there might be a little pointer in the wild to books that others might find interesting, if any books still exist. Sort of a signal from beyond the grave :-)

That lead RDC looks like a very strange hybrid and is maybe something I'd like to build one day.
The caption in the book has this to say,
"
Perhaps the acme in the development of the Budd RDC was the ROGER WILLIAMS train, shown here running as the MURRAY HILL from Boston to New York City at Larchmont, NY, on May 30, 1957."
Photo credit: George E. Votava.

I think I also read somewhere that Anthropic shredded the books because they felt that they no longer had any value once AI had captured the content. I have to admit though that when I read books in the Interurbans Specials series, and other railway books that are photo and illustration heavy, it's not for specific extraction of specific content. I don't have pre-formulated questions to ask that I expect specific answers to, which seems how today's AI seems to work.

Here's how I actually read them, in case any AI is reading this and would like to know :-) 

In the good weather the back porch is where the reading happens. I usually have a small stack of books that for some reason or another I've been thinking about. I gather them up, along with something to drink, coffee, tea, or something stronger depending on mood and time-of-day :-) , pull up a lawn chair, put the books and things on a little table, and settle in.

Me being me, with my model building interests and all, I'm usually drawn first to the photos and illustrations in whatever books are in my stack. I'm just looking for interesting things. When something catches my eye, then the back-and-forth with the text begins as I read and search and think. Sometimes I start with text, but it's usually with images on these expeditions.

On the surface it may sound like something that can easily be replaced with internet browsing and AI questioning. For me though I think the total experience of being outside in good weather, enjoying something to drink, the physicality of the printed pages, and appreciating how easy it is to jump from one page to another, to other books, and back as the search goes on. Maybe a tablet could replace the experience and make it more 'efficient', but I think my efficient is a better efficient as it's a more complete body, mind, and soul experience, and I never know what interesting things I might find.

Oh, and I don't take the books to the shredder when I'm done. No, as time goes on, I'll likely repeat the process with the same books in a different mix when I'm in some other frame-of-mind, thinking of other things. This is where Marie Kondo's work left me horrified. When her work was fairly new I started to read it, but when I got to the part where she recommended cutting out the pieces from books and magazines that 'brought joy' or some such thing, and tossing the rest I nearly passed out. Just because something doesn't 'bring joy' today doesn't mean it won't down the road. I gave up on her writings there and then; they brought me no joy and got tossed.

Ok, well, in good weather, the back porch is where all the reading happens, not just the open ended railway book adventures. There're novels, comics, graphic novels, and so on, last year it was the Inferno while I basked in the sun :-) and this year Purgatorio, and maybe Paradiso if I can survive the trek; there's also sketching ideas in notebooks and so on. Yes, the phone gets out there too, but it hasn't so far replaced my little analog world.

The first railbus, #10, for New Haven by Mack.
The caption reads:
"
Prototype Mack railbus 10 initially excited New Haven officials, who ordered nine more. They were delivered, but a new management made scant use of them."
Photo credit: M. D. McCarter Collection.

Before I wrap things up I should mention a little 'discovery' in Doodlebug Country that teased me, lead me astray a bit, but in the end left me with some interesting information I didn't expect to find. Here's the passage that got me thinking for awhile that there really was something similar to an RDC-M way back when, shrouded in the mists of time :-) :

"After World War II, the New Haven was hit hard by rising costs and declining patronage, particularly on its commuter runs out of Boston. In 1952 President Frederick C. Dumaine, hoping that new equipment would rejuvenate the business, purchased no less than 40 Budd RDC cars and used them to increase the number of trains on most routes.

Dumaine also consulted Mack about a smaller, lighter version of the RDC for branch lines and off-peak commuter service. He wanted a vehicle capable of competing with the motor bus with its rider appeal.

The result was in fact a railbus based on the Mack Type C-50 city bus, dubbed Type FCD in honor of Dumaine. The prototype, car 10 [JDL: shown in the above photo], went into service in 1952. The bus body was a single-end design, but in fact the 40-foot long car could operate in either direction, and often did."

When I first encountered that passage I anxiously read more as I thought Mack might be modifying standard RDCs, but no, they stuck to what they knew; however, it turned out these buses-on-rails didn't turn around the flagging commuter business. 

I highly recommend Doodlebug Country. It shows the wide variety of railcar equipment in use in the first half of the 20th century through an extensive collection of photos and detailed tables of equipment.

8 comments:

  1. Yes, yes, yes to the reading material outside and the beverage in place. Yes, yes, yes also to Marie in her Condo and her idea about clipping magazines. Having gone through this cathartic process, I can attest that it worked for me. Coming from a home in which complete magazines were kept, and a common entreaty was, "Eric, why don't you take a stack of TRAINS magazines out and read them under the tree?" likely in answer to the statement, 'I'm bored' I can also attest to the enjoyment of those moments.

    I do sometimes take a file folder of those clippings, filed by topic like Prototype to Model, Rolling Stock, Structures, Model Railroad Philosophy, Model Railway Layouts outside or to the sunroom to read.

    One more point - the clippings are likely to blow around in a stiff breeze, your books not so much, Jim!

    Eric

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, having them bound does come in handy on those windy days. Sometimes the beverage needs to be firmly anchored too :-)

      Delete
  2. I read the title as WWII flying bombs and wondered - what now? - must read it fully now

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well I write this having just finished watching The Dam Busters, so suitably titled post might appear in the future :-)

      Delete
  3. I have to fess up and admit I'm a magazine clipper, though if I had the space I'd keep a full set of MR. As it is I've got my back issues of RMC, RMJ, etc. in once-trendy heavy card magazine files; glossy white with shiny silver corner protectors, from that Scandinavian super store, and they take up too much space. I'm happy to have the digital copies of MR - the 75 years collection - but I'm clipping my old Railfan & Railroad issues along with TRAINS magazines. My grandfather used to send them on to me when he was finished, back when media-rate mail was cheap.

    I held off doing this until I came across the idea that some items have a shelf life, just like some food has an expiration date. What meets that description for you will be different for someone else, but the realization allowed me to let go of so much I'd been carting around dutifully for years without appreciating its true value. Now I'm enjoying one last flip through the pages of each issue, clipping anything useful or beautiful, and recycling the rest.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can appreciate that storage space can be a problem. I guess what got to me about her recommendation was applying it to books was a step too far. Magazines are basically ephemera, but books, not so much. I remember buying a used copy of a book called 'Kinetic Architecture' by Zuk & Clark. Little did I know pages 51 to 56 brought some reader so much joy that they clipped them out :-( Hopefully in this era, they could just take a photo instead.

      Delete
  4. I have scanned to PDFs for many years, but still retain hard copies - so much easier for the reading room!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One day you'll probably be very happy to have made those pdfs.

      Delete