Model photos courtesy James L. Dixon |
When I first saw these pictures I thought it was the log church from the lost 1964 article, The little church on the hill. It turns out it's a duplicate.
In my excitement at seeing this model I overlooked two key points.
First, there was the obvious one: ELM dated it as 1968 on the bottom, but it appears he did it with a pen instead of a wood burning tool, so I wondered if it was post dated.
Comparing the other images, one can see further differences, but I think the chimney stonework tells the tale, confirming it's a duplicate.
But, even so, it's an excellent model, and I'm glad it has survived in such good condition.
Regardless of being a duplicate, it is of the same charming design as the lost article's log church.The bell tower's cross is missing, but that's easily replaced.
I think, too, I've solved a couple of problems for the incoming pastor.
First, having to pass right under his nose, the members are more than likely to be on time and, once in, not likely to get up and walk out early.
Secondly, with a good hot fire in the rear, the sinners will have to sit up front to be reasonably comfortable, and there he can have a good go at them.
I dare say, 40 years after my own death, I don't expect to see people treasuring my old models. What a testimony to ELM's work it survives and continues to inspire.
ReplyDeleteI hear ya. I expect mine to go straight to a dumpster when the reaper comes for me. ELM's has this aura, related no doubt to his fame in model RR land, as well as the originality and quality of his models, that make people want to hold on to it. I suspect there are many more examples of his work still out there given that he made duplicates, and appears to have done many projects that never got written up as articles.
Delete